ENERGY
REQUIREMENTS OF DESALINATION PROCESSES
It is useful to compare the merits of the various
processes for seawater desalination, as described in the previous sections.
Although the comparison will be primarily qualitative at this stage, it should
be helpful in providing a deeper insight into the strengths and weaknesses of
each process.
Foremost among the aspects
of comparison is the energy consumption of each process. With the known process
specification, it is theoretically possible to calculate the minimum work or
energy needed for separation of pure water from brine. For the real process,
however, the actual work required is likely to be many times the theoretically
possible minimum. This is because the bulk of the work is required to keep the
process going at a finite rate rather than to achieve the separation. The
minimum work needed is equal to the difference in free energy between the
incoming feed (i.e. seawater) and outgoing streams (i.e. product water and
discharge brine). For the normal seawater (3.45 per cent salt) at a temperature
of 25_C, for usual recoveries the minimum work has been calculated as equal to
about 0.86 kWh m-3. Table 1 makes the desired comparison.
Table 1. Energy
requirements of four industrial desalination processes.
|
|
|
MSF
|
MEB
|
MEB/VC
|
RO
|
Possible unit size
|
|
60 000
|
60 000
|
24 000
|
24 000
|
Energy consumption (kWh m-3)
|
Electrical/mechanical
|
4-6
|
2-2.5
|
7-9
|
5-7
|
|
|
Thermal
|
55-120
|
30-120
|
None
|
None
|
Electrical equivalent for
thermal energy
(kWh m-3)
|
|
8-18
|
2.5-10
|
None
|
None
|
Total equivalent energy
consumption (kWh m-3)
|
|
12-24
|
4.5-12.5
|
7-9
|
5-7
|
Source: International
Atomic Energy Agency 1992.
There are no major
technical obstacles to desalination as a means of providing an unlimited supply
of fresh water, but the high energy requirements of this process pose a major
challenge. Theoretically, about 0.86 kWh of energy is needed to desalinate
1 m3 of salt water (34 500 ppm). This is equivalent
to 3 kJ kg-1. The present day desalination plants use 5 to
26 times as much as this theoretical minimum depending on the type of process
used. Clearly, it is necessary to make desalination processes as
energy-efficient as possible through improvements in technology and economies
of scale.
Desalination as currently
practiced is driven almost entirely by the combustion of fossil fuels. These
fuels are in finite supply; they also pollute the air and contribute to global
climate change. The whole character of human society in the 20th century in
terms of its history, economics and politics has been shaped by energy obtained
mostly from oil. Almost all oil produced to date is what is called conventional
oil, which can be made to flow freely from wells (i.e. excluding oil from tar
sands and shale). Of this vast resource, about 1600 billion barrels have so far
been discovered, and just over 800 billion barrels had been used by the end of
1997. It is estimated that there may be a further 400 billion barrels of
conventional oil yet to be found. With current annual global consumption of oil
being approximately 25 billion barrels, and rising at 2 per cent per annum, the
"business as usual" scenario would suggest that the remaining oil will be
exhausted by 2050.
The supply of oil will
undoubtedly be boosted by an increase of supplies from unconventional sources,
notably the tar sands and shale of Canada and the
"Orinoco sludge" of Venezuela. This oil can only be extracted using high energy
inputs, and at very high environmental costs. There will be strong political
and international pressure against development of these resources, but, when
world oil prices are high enough, production will inevitably increase. In
theory, unconventional oil could stretch the world's oil supply by another 30
years. In practice, of course, the rate of consumption of oil will be heavily
influenced by economic and many other factors, so that prediction in this area
is very difficult. The political situation of two of the world's largest
potential producers, Iran and Iraq, could be highly relevant to supplies as
well as to the global political economy. It is clear, however, that one of the
most important of the influencing factors will be the relative cost of
renewable energy and how quickly the world can switch to sustainable
technologies. There is nothing to gain by deferring investment in this area,
and everything to lose by postponing it any longer.
To read more
about this topic subscribe DESWARE On-line.
|