ENERGY
REQUIREMENTS OF DESALINATION PROCESSES
It is useful to compare
the merits of the various processes for seawater
desalination, as described in the previous sections.
Although the comparison will be primarily qualitative at
this stage, it should be helpful in providing a deeper
insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each
process.
Foremost among the aspects of comparison is the energy
consumption of each process. With the known process
specification, it is theoretically possible to calculate
the minimum work or energy needed for separation of pure
water from brine. For the real process, however, the
actual work required is likely to be many times the
theoretically possible minimum. This is because the bulk
of the work is required to keep the process going at a
finite rate rather than to achieve the separation. The
minimum work needed is equal to the difference in free
energy between the incoming feed (i.e. seawater) and
outgoing streams (i.e. product water and discharge
brine). For the normal seawater (3.45 per cent salt) at
a temperature of 25 0C, for usual recoveries
the minimum work has been calculated as equal to about
0.86 kWh m-3. Table 1 makes the desired
comparison.
Table 1. Energy requirements of four industrial
desalination processes.
|
|
MSF
|
MED-TVC
|
MED
|
MVC
|
RO
|
|
Typical unit size m3
d-1
|
50,000 - 70,000
|
10,000 - 35,000
|
5,000 - 15,000
|
100 - 2500
|
24,000
|
|
Electrical Energy
Consumption kWh m-3
|
4 – 6
|
1.5 – 2.5
|
1.5 – 2.5
|
7 - 12
|
3 – 5.5
|
|
Thermal Energy Consumption
kJ kg -1
|
190 (GOR =12.2) – 390 (GOR
=6)
|
145 (GOR =16) – 390 (GOR =6)
#1
|
230 (GOR =10) – 390 (GOR =6)
|
None
|
None
|
|
Electrical Equivalent #2
for Thermal Energy kWh m-3
|
#3
9.5 – 19.5
|
#4
9.5 – 25.5
|
#5
5 – 8.5
|
None
|
None
|
|
Total Equivalent Energy
Consumption kWh m-3
|
13.5 - 25.5
|
11 - 28
|
6.5 - 11
|
7 - 12
|
3 - 3.5 (Up to 7 with Boron treatment)
|
GOR – Gain Output Ratio
#1 Lower Value to be applied only
if heating energy is extremely expensive,
e.g
in combination with solar energy heating.
#2 Electrical equivalent is
that electrical energy which cannot be produced in a
turbine because of extraction of the heating steam
#3 Assuming that pressure in the condonser
of a large commercial steam turbine is kept at 0.1
bara
at a seawater temperature of 35 0C and steam
extraction pressure is some 3.5 bara
(loss is 475 kJ /kg steam)
#4 Assuming that pressure in the condenser of a large commercial
steam turbine is kept at 0.1 bara
at a seawater temperature of 35 0C and steam
extraction pressure is some 15
bara (loss is 737 kJ/kg steam)
#5 Assuming that pressure in the condenser of a large commercial
steam turbine is kept at 0.1 bara
at a seawater temperature of 35 0C and steam
extraction pressure is some 0.5
bara (loss is 258 kJ/kg steam)
Note: In this case GOR includes Steam/heat for
Vacuum system Source: WANGNICK CONSULTING (2010)
There
are no major technical obstacles to desalination as a means of providing an
unlimited supply of fresh water, but the high energy requirements of this
process pose a major challenge. Theoretically, about 0.86 kWh of energy is
needed to desalinate 1 m3 of salt water (34 500 ppm). This is
equivalent to 3 kJ kg-1. The present day desalination plants use 5 to
26 times as much as this theoretical minimum depending on the type of process
used. Clearly, it is necessary to make desalination processes as
energy-efficient as possible through improvements in technology and economies of
scale.
Desalination as currently practiced is driven almost
entirely by the combustion of fossil fuels. These fuels
are in finite supply; they also pollute the air and
contribute to global climate change. The whole character
of human society in the 20th century in terms of its
history, economics and politics has been shaped by
energy obtained mostly from oil. Almost all oil produced
to date is what is called conventional oil, which can be
made to flow freely from wells (i.e. excluding oil from
tar sands and shale). Of this vast resource, about 1600
billion barrels have so far been discovered, and just
over 800 billion barrels had been used by the end of
1997. It is estimated that there may be a further 400
billion barrels of conventional oil yet to be found.
With current annual global consumption of oil being
approximately 25 billion barrels, and rising at 2 per
cent per annum, the "business as usual" scenario would
suggest that the remaining oil will be exhausted by
2050.
The supply of oil will undoubtedly be boosted by an
increase of supplies from unconventional sources,
notably the tar sands and shale of Canada and the
"Orinoco sludge" of Venezuela. This oil can only
be extracted using high energy inputs, and at very high
environmental costs. There will be strong political and
international pressure against development of these
resources, but, when world oil prices are high enough,
production will inevitably increase. In theory,
unconventional oil could stretch the world's oil supply
by another 30 years. In practice, of course, the rate of
consumption of oil will be heavily influenced by
economic and many other factors, so that prediction in
this area is very difficult. The political situation of
two of the world's largest potential producers, Iran and
Iraq, could be highly relevant to supplies as well as to
the global political economy. It is clear, however, that
one of the most important of the influencing factors
will be the relative cost of renewable energy and how
quickly the world can switch to sustainable
technologies. There is nothing to gain by deferring
investment in this area, and everything to lose by
postponing it any longer.
To read more about this topic subscribe DESWARE On-line.
|